ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Quantifying Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Analysis Across 12 Deep Learning Models.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Detection and Management of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Noninvasive Retinal Images and Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of deep learning-based retinal pigment epithelium segmentation for a widely used optical coherence tomography device.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy: A Multi-Center, Multi-Device Validation in a Real-World Clinical Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Quantification of Macular OCT Alterations Improves the Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Rethinking Clinical Trials in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: How AI-Based OCT Analysis Can Support Successful Outcomes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Longitudinal Comparison of Geographic Atrophy Enlargement Using Manual, Semiautomated, and Deep Learning Approaches.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: AI algorithms have shown impressive performance in segmenting geographic atrophy (GA) from fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images. However, selection of artificial intelligence (AI) architecture is an important variable in model development. Here, we explore 12 distinct AI architecture combinations to determine the most effective approach for GA segmentation. Methods: We investigated various AI architectures, each with distinct combinations of encoders and decoders. The architectures included three decoders-FPN (Feature Pyramid Network), UNet, and PSPNet (Pyramid Scene Parsing Network)-and serve as the foundation framework for segmentation task. Encoders including EfficientNet, ResNet (Residual Networks), VGG (Visual Geometry Group) and Mix Vision Transformer (mViT) have a role in extracting optimum latent features for accurate GA segmentation. Performance was measured through comparison of GA areas between human and AI predictions and Dice Coefficient (DC). Results: The training dataset included 601 FAF images from AREDS2 study and validation included 156 FAF images from the GlaxoSmithKline study. The mean absolute difference between grader measured and AI predicted areas ranged from -0.08 (95% CI = -1.35, 1.19) to 0.73 mm2 (95% CI = -5.75,4.29) and DC between 0.884-0.993. The best-performing models were UNet and FPN frameworks with mViT, and the least-performing models were PSPNet framework. Conclusions: The choice of AI architecture impacts GA segmentation performance. Vision transformers with FPN and UNet architectures demonstrate stronger suitability for this task compared to Convolutional Neural Network- and PSPNet-based models. Selecting an AI architecture must be tailored to the specific goals of the project, and developers should consider which architecture is ideal for their project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.