Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39046595›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

The role of VI-RADS scoring criteria for predicting oncological outcomes in bladder cancer.

Mieszko Kozikowski, Magdalena Zagrodzka, Marek Zawadzki, Przemysław Zugaj, Rafał Osiecki, Franciszek Rzymkowski, Mateusz Śledź, Roman Sosnowski, Jakub Dobruch, Francesco Del Giudice and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mieszko KozikowskiPolish Center of Advanced Urology, Department of Urology, St. Anne's Hospital EMC, Piaseczno, Poland. mieszkokozikowski9@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7533-4297
Magdalena ZagrodzkaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging - Quadia, Piaseczno, Poland.
Marek ZawadzkiPolish Center of Advanced Urology, Department of Urology, St. Anne's Hospital EMC, Piaseczno, Poland.
Przemysław ZugajPolish Center of Advanced Urology, Department of Urology, St. Anne's Hospital EMC, Piaseczno, Poland.
Rafał OsieckiUrology Clinic of Medical Postgraduate Education Centre, Department of Urology, Independent Public Hospital them. prof. W. Orlowski, Warsaw, Poland.
Franciszek RzymkowskiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging - Quadia, Piaseczno, Poland.
Mateusz ŚledźDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging - Quadia, Piaseczno, Poland.
Roman SosnowskiSection of Urologic Oncology of Polish Urological Association, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub DobruchUrology Clinic of Medical Postgraduate Education Centre, Department of Urology, Independent Public Hospital them. prof. W. Orlowski, Warsaw, Poland.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Wojciech KrajewskiSection of Urologic Oncology of Polish Urological Association, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur purpose was to evaluate the prognostic value of Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in bladder cancer (BCa) staging and predicting recurrence or progression.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data from 96 patients with bladder tumors who underwent VI-RADS-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) before endourological treatment from April 2021 to December 2022. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by comparing mpMRI reports with final pathology, using logistic regression for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) predictors. Follow-up until May 2023 included Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis to assess VI-RADS predictive roles for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsA total of 96 patients (19.8% women, 80.2% men; median age 68.0 years) were included, with 71% having primary tumors and 29% recurrent BCa. Multiparametric MRI exhibited high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (79%) in predicting MIBC, showing no significant differences between primary and recurrent cancers (AUC: 0.96 vs. 0.92, P = .565). VI-RADS emerged as a key predictor for MIBC in both univariate (OR: 40.3, P < .001) and multivariate (OR: 54.6, P < .001) analyses. Primary tumors with VI-RADS ≥ 3 demonstrated significantly shorter RFS (P = .02) and PFS (P = .04).

conclusionsIn conclusion, mpMRI with VI-RADS has a high diagnostic value in predicting MIBC in both primary and recurrent BCa. A VI-RADS threshold ≥ 3 is a strong predictor for MIBC, and in primary tumors predicts early recurrence and progression.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBladder cancerBladder cancer stagingMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39046595
PMCPMC11269435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.