ArticleEndocrine2024
CT-based artificial intelligence prediction model for ocular motility score of thyroid eye disease.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The therapeutic revolution in thyroid eye disease: from orbital radiotherapy to teprotumumab and AI.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Advancements and challenges of ultrasound imaging in the management of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in oculoplastics: Novel applications and future prospects.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThyroid eye disease (TED) is the most common orbital disease in adults. Ocular motility restriction is the primary complaint of patients, while its evaluation is quite difficult. The present study aimed to introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) model based on orbital computed tomography (CT) images for ocular motility score.
methodsA total of 410 sets of CT images and clinical data were obtained from the hospital. To build a triple classification predictive model for ocular motility score, multiple deep learning models were employed to extract features of images and clinical data. Subgroup analyses based on pertinent clinical features were performed to test the efficacy of models.
resultsThe ResNet-34 network outperformed Alex-Net and VGG16-Net in prediction of ocular motility score, with the optimal accuracy (ACC) of 0.907, 0.870, and 0.890, respectively. Subgroup analyses indicated no significant difference in ACC between active or inactive phase, functional visual field diplopia or peripheral visual field diplopia (p > 0.05). However, in the gender subgroup, the prediction model performed more accurately in female patients than males (p = 0.02).
conclusionIn conclusion, the AI model based on CT images and clinical data successfully realized automatic scoring of ocular motility in TED patients. This approach potentially enhanced the efficiency and accuracy of ocular motility evaluation, thus facilitating clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39046593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.