SynthesisEuropean radiology2025
Comparative efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation in benign thyroid nodule treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation for Benign Non-Functioning Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Ablative Technologies for Thyroid Nodules: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2026Pooled it
- Radiofrequency versus microwave ablation for non-functioning benign thyroid nodules: a single-institution comparative cohort study.Endocrine · 2026Article
- Implementing Ultrasound-Guided Microwave Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules in ENT Practice: Technical Considerations and Early Clinical Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Symptom Relief from Percutaneous Benign Thyroid Nodule Radiofrequency Ablation in Routine Clinical Care.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Comparing the therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency vs. Microwave ablation for non-functioning benign thyroid nodules.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and functional preservation of microwave ablation versus surgical resection for benign thyroid nodules: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of 7 versus 10 mm Active Tips in Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation for Benign Nodules.AACE endocrinology and diabetesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveUltrasound-guided thermal ablation, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), has become one of the main options for treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs). To assess the efficacy of thermal ablation of BTNs, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases was performed up to September 25, 2023, to identify studies directly comparing RFA and MWA for pathologically proven BTNs and reporting clinical outcomes and complications. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two radiologists according to PRISMA guidelines. The analysis yielded the serial volume reduction ratios (VRRs) of ablated nodules for up to 12 months, symptom and cosmetic scores, and complications.
resultsThis analysis included nine studies with 1305 BTNs treated by RFA and 1276 by MWA. VRRs at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were similar between RFA and MWA, but RFA showed a significantly higher VRR (83.3%) than MWA (76.9%) at 12 months (p = 0.02). Complication rates showed no significant difference between the two methods. Symptom and cosmetic scores significantly decreased after ablation, without a significant difference between the methods. Subgroup analysis indicated a significantly higher VRR at 12 months for RFA than for MWA for less experienced investigators (≤ 10 years), but no significant difference for more experienced investigators (> 10 years).
conclusionRFA and MWA are both effective and safe methods for treating BTNs. RFA showed a higher VRR at 12 months and seems more suitable for less experienced investigators. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: RFA and MWA are both effective and safe treatments for BTNs, with RFA showing a higher VRR at 12 months. Both methods offer minimally invasive and reliable treatment for thyroid nodules. KEY POINTS: The most effective thermal ablation technique for BTNs remains undetermined. RFA showed a higher VRR at 12 months than MWA. Both techniques are effective for treating thyroid nodules; RFA offers greater benefits, particularly for less experienced investigators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39046500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.