ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Feasibility evaluation of the Versius surgical system: robot-assisted hysterectomy for benign and malignant gynaecological lesions.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and feasibility of the versius robotic surgical system for colorectal resection: proportional meta-analysis of single-arm studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive Comparison of Features of Robotic Surgery Systems in Abdominal Surgeries: A Narrative Review Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Versius surgical system: tips and tricks for OR setting and port placement for pelvic surgery, our experience in a multi-robotic referral centre.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe application of minimally invasive surgery allows for radical and precise removal of the gynaecological lesion while simultaneously reducing the side effects and complications associated with surgical treatment. This paper aims to share our direct experience with the implementation of the CMR Versius robotic platform in the treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological lesions.
methodsThis study included patients who underwent hysterectomy in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Gynaecologic Oncology at the Regional Polyclinical Hospital in Grudziadz, Poland. A total of 50 patients were included in the study: 29 underwent laparoscopic surgery and 21 underwent robot-assisted surgery using the CMR Versius system.
resultsIt was found that in the case of non-radical hysterectomy, the duration of surgery differed significantly (96.5 vs. 134.6 min, p < 0.01) in the groups of patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery. There were also no statistically significant differences in loss of blood parameters, rate of complications and conversions to other type of surgery after the laparoscopic and robotic surgeries. Both groups did not differ significantly in terms of hospitalisation time after surgery.
conclusionVersius CMR surgical robot assistance provides safe and effective support for MIS procedures in gynaecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.