ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2024
Tonic Stimulation of Dorsal Root Ganglion Results in Progressive Decline in Recruitment of Aα/β-Fibers in Rats.
Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming failure: improving acceptance and success of implanted neural interfaces.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Review
- Dorsal root ganglia CSF1Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIn this study, we aimed to characterize the recruitment and maintenance of action potential firing in Aα/β-fibers generated during tonic dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) applied over a range of clinically relevant stimulation parameters. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe delivered electrical stimulation to the L5 dorsal root ganglion and recorded antidromic evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in the sciatic nerve during DRGS in Sprague Dawley rats. We measured charge thresholds to elicit ECAPs in Aα/β-fibers during DRGS applied at multiple pulse widths (50, 150, 300, 500 μs) and frequencies (5, 20, 50, 100 Hz). We measured the peak-to-peak amplitudes, latencies, and widths of ECAPs generated during 180 seconds of DRGS, and excitation threshold changes to investigate potential mechanisms of ECAP suppression.
resultsTonic DRGS produced ECAPs in Aα/β-fibers at charge thresholds below the motor threshold. Increasing the pulse width of DRGS led to a significant increase in the charge required to elicit ECAPs in Aα/β-fibers, while varying DRGS frequency did not influence ECAP thresholds. Over the course of 180 seconds, ECAP peak-to-peak amplitude decreased progressively in a frequency-dependent manner, where 5- and 100-Hz DRGS resulted in 22% and 87% amplitude reductions, respectively, and ECAP latencies increased from baseline measurements during DRGS at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz. Regardless of DRGS frequency, ECAP amplitudes recovered within 120 seconds after turning DRGS off. We determined that ECAP suppression may be attributed to increasing excitation thresholds for individual fibers during DRGS. Following 180 seconds of DRGS, an average of 7.33% increase in stimulation amplitude was required to restore the ECAP to baseline amplitude.
conclusionsDRGS produces a progressive and frequency-dependent reduction in ECAP amplitude that occurs within and above the frequency range used clinically to relieve pain. If DRGS-mediated analgesia relies on Aβ-fiber activation, then the frequency or duty cycle of stimulation should be set to the lowest effective level to maintain sufficient activation of Aβ-fibers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.