Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39046288›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

Slow-exploring captive red knots were quicker to find food in a social setting than fast explorers.

Aileen Roncoroni, Selin Ersoy, Allert I Bijleveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aileen RoncoroniDepartment of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-2133-6629
Selin ErsoyDepartment of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4657-4360
Allert I BijleveldDepartment of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-8944

Funding

Aard- en Levenswetenschappen, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals foraging in groups face increased competition but can benefit from social information on foraging opportunities that can ultimately increase survival. Personality traits can be associated with food-finding strategies, such as shyer individuals scrounging on the food discoveries of others. How personality and foraging strategy interact in a social foraging context with different group compositions received less attention. Here, we conducted experiments to investigate the relationship between exploratory personality, group size (1-4 birds) and foraging success (i.e. speed of finding a food patch) in wild-caught red knots. We found that faster explorers, when foraging alone, discover food patches quicker than slower explorers. In groups, however, slower-exploring birds became quicker at finding food than fast explorers. This shows that slower-exploring individuals benefit from group foraging. They seem to be more perceptive to social cues, and in contrast to faster explorers, they become quicker at finding food when they are in a group than when foraging alone. We discuss how individuals with different personalities and foraging strategies can coexist in a social foraging context with different costs and benefits associated with their strategies.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsExploratory BehaviorMalePersonalityanimal personalityexplorationforaging successproducer–scrounger tacticsred knotssocial information

Identifiers

PMID39046288
PMCPMC11268155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.