ArticleCritical care science2024
Science over language: a plea to consider language bias in scientific publishing.
Article in Critical care science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Scientific Evidence in Public Health Decision-Making: A Systematic Literature Review of the Past 50 Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of dental research excellence: an analysis of Stanford-Elsevier lists of the top 2% scholars worldwide (2017-2023).Frontiers in oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Global disparities in scientific publications: A 5-year analysis of 10 critical care journals.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Engaging Underserved Populations in Health Preference Research: Challenges and Strategies.The patient · 2025Article
- Improving English proficiency for scientific communication by non-fluent speakers.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Article
- To: Science over language: a plea to consider language bias in scientific publishing.Critical care science · 2025Article
- Peer review for medical journals: why and how?Critical care science · 2025Article
- Where should I publish my scientific article? Insights from the editors of Critical Care Science and Critical Care Resuscitation.Critical care science · 2025Article
- South‒South research collaborations in critical care.Critical care science · 2025Article
- Closing the critical care knowledge gap: the importance of publications from low-income and middle-income countries.Critical care science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.