Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045977›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2024

Validation of an instrument for assessing leprosy care in children and adolescents.

Gutembergue Santos de Sousa, Isael Marcos Silva Mendonça, Lia Hanna Martins Morita, Denise da Costa Boamorte Cortela, Pãmela Rodrigues de Souza Silva, Silvana Margarida Benevides Ferreira

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gutembergue Santos de SousaUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso. Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3672-4388
Isael Marcos Silva MendonçaFaculdade para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável da Amazônia. Parauapebas, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4162-7569
Lia Hanna Martins MoritaUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso. Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5912-5754
Denise da Costa Boamorte CortelaUniversidade do Estado do Mato Grosso. Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0052-6216
Pãmela Rodrigues de Souza SilvaUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso. Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3602-603X
Silvana Margarida Benevides FerreiraUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso. Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7421-5803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto validate the content of an instrument for assessing leprosy care in individuals under 15 years old in the context of Primary Health Care.

methodsmethodological study of content validation, based on the evaluation of essential and derived attributes in primary care, in the professional version. For data analysis, the Content Validation Index (CVI ≥ 0.8) and Cronbach's Alpha were calculated.

resultsa higher percentage of judges among nurses (61.5%) was observed; with a doctorate (46.2%), and engaged in teaching and research (77%). The overall Content Validation Index of the instrument was 0.98. In the analysis of Cronbach's Alpha of the instrument, the assigned value was 0.717.

conclusionsthe instrument represents an advancement in the measurement of health evaluation policies and can significantly contribute to improving the quality of care provided to children and adolescents with leprosy.

Indexed as

LeprosyPrimary Health CareAdolescentBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39045977
PMCPMC11259440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.