Trial reportRevista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes2024
Efficacy and safety of topical application of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing reconstructive plastic surgery after excision of facial skin cancers: a randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Definition, analysis, reporting, and interpretation of perioperative bleeding in randomized controlled trials: a methodological systematic review.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- International survey on the use of tranexamic acid in plastic surgery-Current practices and perspectives.JPRAS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTranexamic acid (TA) has attracted increased attention among surgical specialties, but its use in plastic surgery is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of topical administration of 3% TA solution in reconstructive surgery of the face and scalp after excision of skin cancers.
methodsa randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in patients aged 18 years or older with malignant skin neoplasms in the face or scalp region (ICD-10 C44.9). The primary outcome was volume of blood loss in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included difficult-to-control intraoperative haemorrhage, hematoma, ecchymosis, and other adverse events.
resultsof the 54 included patients, 26 were randomised to TA group and 28 to placebo group. The mean blood loss was 11.42ml (SD 6.40, range 8.83-14.01) in the TA group, and 17.6ml (SD 6.22, range 15.19-20.01) in the placebo group, representing a mean decrease of 6.18ml (35.11%) (p=0.001). TA significantly reduced the risk of ecchymosis (RR = 0.046; 95% CI: 0.007-0.323). Only two patients in the placebo group experienced ischemia in the flaps, and one patient in the placebo group experienced tissue necrosis requiring surgical reintervention. There were no surgical wound infections, thromboembolic phenomena, or other adverse events related to TA.
conclusionstopical TA may reduce intraoperative and immediate postoperative bleeding, with a significantly decreased risk of ecchymosis. There is no evidence of ischemic damage of flaps, systemic thromboembolic complications, or other adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.