ArticleCancer medicine2024
Caucasian validation of downstaging from IIB to IIA in T1N1M0 patients within the 9th edition of the non-small cell lung cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic significance of total metabolic tumor volume on baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with lung adenocarcinoma: further stratification of the ninth edition of TNM staging subgroups.Nuclear medicine communications · 2025Article
- Caucasian validation of downstaging from IIB to IIA in T1N1M0 patients within the 9th edition of the non-small cell lung cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 9th edition of the lung cancer tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging introduced adjustments, including the reclassification of T1N1M0 patients from stage IIB to IIA. This update used data mostly from Asian populations. However, the applicability of these adjustments to Caucasian patients remains uncertain.
methodsStage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing compared overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-based Cox analyses identified prognostic factors.
resultsAmong 10,470 eligible stage II NSCLC patients (median age: 69 years; male: 53.1%), there were 2736 in stage IIA, 2112 in IIA New, and 5622 in IIB groups. Before PSM, survival outcomes of stage IIA New patients were similar to those of stage IIA patients but better than those of stage IIB. After PSM, stage IIA New and IIB patients showed similar survival rates (OS, p = 0.276; CSS, p = 0.565). Conversely, stage IIA New patients had worse outcomes than stage IIA patients (OS, p < 0.001; CSS, p = 0.005). LASSO-based Cox analyses confirmed stage IIA New patients had inferior prognosis compared to stage IIA patients (OS HR: 1 vs. 1.325, p < 0.001; CSS HR: 1 vs. 1.327, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe downstaging of T1N1M0 patients from stage IIB to IIA in the 9th edition TNM staging remains unverified in Caucasians. Caution is warranted in assessing the staging and prognosis of these individuals. Further validation of our findings is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.