Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045810›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Designing cities for everyday nature.

Casey Visintin, Georgia E Garrard, Wolfgang W Weisser, Mauro Baracco, Richard J Hobbs, Sarah A Bekessy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Designing cities for everyday nature.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Casey VisintinInterdisciplinary Conservation Science Group, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2245-8998
Georgia E GarrardSchool of Ecosystem & Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Wolfgang W WeisserDepartment of Life Science Systems, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Mauro BaraccoBaracco+Wright, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
Richard J HobbsSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Sarah A BekessyInterdisciplinary Conservation Science Group, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

ARC Discovery DP200103501ARC Discovery DP210103787ARC Linkage LP160100324ARC Linkage LP190100453EU FET OPEN 964414H2020 Urban GreenupRECETAS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motivations for incorporating nature into the design of cities have never been more compelling. Creating experiences with nature that occur every day (everyday nature) in cities could help reverse the fate of many threatened species and connect people with nature and living cultural traditions. However, this requires more than just urban greening; it involves ensuring daily doses of nature in a way that also supports nonhuman organisms. A major shift in the way nature is conceived of and is made part of the design of cities is required. Principles include reconsidering nature as a development opportunity rather than a constraint and eliminating offsetting of biodiversity site values. Processes include using biodiversity-sensitive design frameworks and establishing meaningful professional engagement among ecologists, planners, and designers. Challenges include design obstacles, conflicts between nature and people (e.g., safety, disease, and noise) that require careful management, and socioeconomic and political considerations (e.g., Global North vs. Global South). Research to interrogate the multiple benefits of nature in cities can complement experimental interventions, ultimately supporting better urban design and creating much more resiliently built environments for people and nature.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentCitiesCity PlanningConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironment DesignNatureBiodiversityAADanimal‐aided designarchitecturearquitecturabiodiversity‐sensitive urban designBSUDDAAdiseño apoyado por animalesdiseño urbano sensible con la biodiversidadDUSBlandscape architecturenature‐based solutionsplaneaciónplanningreverdecimiento urbanosoluciones basadas en la naturalezasustainabilitysustentabilidadurban greening

Identifiers

PMID39045810
PMCPMC11780218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.