Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045722›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

Which patients need anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after initial treatment with rehabilitation? A scoping review.

Kamilla Arp, Jacob Nedermark, Kim Gordon Ingwersen, Eva Ageberg, Claus Varnum, Bjarke Viberg

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Which patients need anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after initial treatment with rehabilitation? A scoping review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kamilla ArpDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital-Vejle, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-5000
Jacob NedermarkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital-Vejle, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Kim Gordon IngwersenDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-4532
Eva AgebergDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-3006
Claus VarnumDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital-Vejle, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-5691
Bjarke VibergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5169-4282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSome patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury initially treated with rehabilitation need ACL reconstruction (ACLR); yet, it is unclear what characterizes these patients. This review aimed to describe predictors for ACLR in patients initially treated with rehabilitation.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in the Cochrane, Embase, Medline, SportsDiscus and Web of Science databases from inception to 21 February 2023. Articles describing characteristics in adult patients with ACL injury undergoing ACLR after a minimum of 5 weeks rehabilitation were included. It was a priori chosen that characteristics described in at least three articles were considered more certain and could be defined as a predictor for ACLR, and those described in less than three articles were considered less certain and therefore defined as possible predictors. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers. The study was originally intended as a systematic review with meta-analysis, but in case of limited data, we would convert it to a scoping review, as was the case for this review.

resultsThere were 22,836 studies identified, and 181 full texts were screened, of which 10 papers were finally included. Only lower age and higher preinjury activity level were identified as predictors for ACLR. Another 12 possible predictors were identified in single studies. Through an iterative process, potential predictors were categorized into four groups: patient demographics, knee function, patient-reported outcome measures and anatomical structures.

conclusionLower age and higher preinjury activity level were the only predictors for ACLR after initial treatment with rehabilitation. While younger and highly active patients show a higher need for ACLR, more studies focussing on predictors and reasons for delayed ACLR are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAdultAge FactorsHumansanterior cruciate ligamentanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionnonsurgical treatmentpredictorsrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39045722
PMCPMC11792103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.