Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045693›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Improve animal health to reduce livestock emissions: quantifying an open goal.

Ilias Kyriazakis, Claudia Arndt, Aurelie Aubry, Johannes Charlier, Vanessa O Ezenwa, Olivia F Godber, Mogens Krogh, Pim F Mostert, Karin Orsel, Mark W Robinson and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ilias KyriazakisInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7703-3626
Claudia ArndtMazingira Centre for Environmental Research and Education, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0009-0007-5699-0102
Aurelie AubryAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, UK.
Johannes CharlierKreavet, Kruibeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1332-1458
Vanessa O EzenwaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-1913
Olivia F GodberDepartment of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9113-8026
Mogens KroghDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-6676
Pim F MostertWageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Karin OrselFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-5188
Mark W RobinsonInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-0034
Frances S RyanSupporting Evidence-Based Interventions in Livestock, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Philip J SkuceMoredun Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2099-5979
Taro TakahashiAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3492-7299
Corina E van MiddelaarAnimal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6835-998X
Stafford VigorsSchool of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9303-4784
Eric R MorganInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-7728

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from livestock production must be urgently tackled to substantially reduce their contribution to global warming. Simply reducing livestock numbers to this end risks impacting negatively on food security, rural livelihoods and climate change adaptation. We argue that significant mitigation of livestock emissions can be delivered immediately by improving animal health and hence production efficiency, but this route is not prioritized because its benefits, although intuitive, are poorly quantified. Rigorous methodology must be developed to estimate emissions from animal disease and hence achievable benefits from improved health through interventions. If, as expected, climate change is to affect the distribution and severity of health conditions, such quantification becomes of even greater importance. We have therefore developed a framework and identified data sources for robust quantification of the relationship between animal health and greenhouse gas emissions, which could be applied to drive and account for positive action. This will not only help mitigate climate change but at the same time promote cost-effective food production and enhanced animal welfare, a rare win-win in the search for a sustainable planetary future.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeGreenhouse GasesLivestockAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimal WelfareGlobal WarmingGreenhouse Gasesanimal healthclimate changediseaseenvironmental impactgreenhouse gas emissionslivestock

Identifiers

PMID39045693
PMCPMC11267467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.