Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045691›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Anna Orteu, Emily A Hornett, Louise A Reynolds, Ian A Warren, Gregory D D Hurst, Simon H Martin, Chris D Jiggins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hidden in plain sight: (Re)definition of a key lepidopteran color patterning gene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna OrteuTree of Life Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3911-0747
Emily A HornettInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7747-0583
Louise A ReynoldsInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7152-3170
Ian A WarrenTree of Life Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Gregory D D HurstInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Simon H MartinInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-7456
Chris D JigginsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

American Society of NaturalistsAustralian Research CouncilCambridge TrustNatural Environment Research CouncilRoyal SocietySt. John's CollegeVarley-Gradwell Travelling Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which evolution is repeatable has been a debated topic among evolutionary biologists. Although rewinding the tape of life perhaps would not lead to the same outcome every time, repeated evolution of analogous genes for similar functions has been extensively reported. Wing phenotypes of butterflies and moths have provided a wealth of examples of gene re-use, with certain 'hotspot loci' controlling wing patterns across diverse taxa. Here, we present an example of convergent evolution in the molecular genetic basis of Batesian wing mimicry in two

Indexed as

Biological MimicryButterfliesWings, AnimalAnimalsBiological EvolutionMicroRNAsPhenotypePigmentationMicroRNAsconvergent evolutioncortexivorymimicry

Identifiers

PMID39045691
PMCPMC11267468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.