Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045578›Full record

ReviewRegenerative therapy2024

Wound fluid sampling methods and analysis of cytokine mRNA expression in ulcers from patients with diabetes mellitus.

Beatriz Barbieri, Amanda Silva, Joseane Morari, Flavia C Zanchetta, Bianca Oliveira, Alexis Trott, Eliana P Araújo, Geraldo Paula, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista de Oliveira, Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto Pires and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Inflammation, diabetic foot and related treatments.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Beatriz BarbieriFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.
Amanda SilvaAurora de Afonso Costa Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil.
Joseane MorariLaboratory of Cell Signaling, Obesity and Comorbidities Research Center, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.
Flavia C ZanchettaFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.
Bianca OliveiraAurora de Afonso Costa Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil.
Alexis TrottFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Eliana P AraújoFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.
Geraldo PaulaFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.
Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista de OliveiraAurora de Afonso Costa Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil.
Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto PiresAurora de Afonso Costa Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil.
Maria Helena Melo LimaFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of diabetic foot ulcers is a common and severe complication of diabetes that can significantly affect quality of life. The physiological healing cascade does not progress tissue repair in diabetic foot ulcerations in a timely manner. Serum markers from foot ulcers have been used to characterize the healing process of the diabetic foot using various collection techniques. This study aimed to compare the use of cervical brushes and the Levine technique to collect wound fluid from foot ulcers of people with diabetes in order to determine the presence of cytokines. The collected material was used for gene expression analysis of macrophage/monocyte-associated cytokines IL1-β, IL-6, TNF-α, regulatory cytokine IL-10 and growth factor TGFβ, via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Both collection methods produced sufficient amounts of RNA, but significantly more RNA was collected using a cervical brush (brush 224.82 ng/μL vs. Levine 80.90 ng/μL p = 0.0001). Significantly higher levels of expression of the following cytokine genes were detected in samples collected using a cervical brush: IL1-β (p = 0.0001), IL-6 (p = 0.0106), IL-10 (p = 0.0277) and TGFβ (p = 0.0002). Understanding why some wounds are difficult to heal is important for developing more effective treatments, and biomarkers may be useful for predicting the healing trajectory. These results demonstrate that it is possible to collect material from the wound bed for RT-qPCR analysis, and the cervical brush proved to be a simple and rapid method for monitoring cytokine gene expression.

Indexed as

Chronic woundCytokineDiabetes mellitusUlcerWound fluid

Identifiers

PMID39045578
PMCPMC11263945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.