ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2024
Pharmacophore-based virtual screening of commercial databases against β-secretase 1 for drug development against Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
β-secretase 1, one of the most important proteins, is an aspartate protease. This membrane-associated protein is used for treating Alzheimer's disease (AD). Several inhibitors have been pursued against β-secretase 1, but they still have not resulted effectively. Virtual screening based on pharmacophores has been shown to be useful for lead optimization and hit identification in the preliminary phase of developing a new drug. Here, we screen the commercially available databases to find the hits against β-secretase 1 for drug discovery against AD. Virtual screening for 200,000 compounds was done using the database from the Vitas-M Laboratory. The phase screen score was utilized to assess the screened hits. Molecular docking was performed on compounds with phase scores >1.9. According to the study, the 66H ligand of the crystal structure has the maximum performance against β-secretase 1. The redocking of the co-crystal ligand showed that the docked ligand was seamlessly united with the crystal structure. The reference complex had three hydrogen bonds with Asp93, Asp289, and Gly291; one van der Waals interaction with Gly74; and three hydrophobic interactions. After equilibration, the RMSD of the reference compound sustained a value of ∼1.5 Å until 30 ns and then boosted to 2.5 Å. On comparison, the RMSD of the S1 complex steadily increased to ∼2.5 Å at 15 ns, displayed slight aberrations at approximately ∼2.5-3 Å until 80 ns, and then achieved steadiness toward the end of the simulation. The arrangements of proteins stayed condensed during the mockup when bonded to these complexes as stable Rg values showed. Furthermore, the MM/GBSA technique was employed to analyze both compounds' total binding free energies (ΔGtotal). Our research study provides a new understanding of using 66H as anti-β-secretase 1 for drug development against AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.