ReviewMaterials today. Bio2024
3D printing tissue-engineered scaffolds for auricular reconstruction.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellularized Thermoformed Scaffolds with Human Septal Chondrocytes Support In Vivo Cartilage Maturation for Auricular Reconstruction.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Modular Tissue-Engineered Motor Units Featuring Spinal Motor Neurons Innervating Self-Assembled Myofiber Bundles.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- DLP bioprinting of cartilage organoid-laden bioinks yields high-fidelity auricular constructs with enhanced chondrogenesis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Engineered Tissue Constructs: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bioinspired and smart material systems for auricular cartilage engineering: toward microenvironment-responsive and self-regulating scaffolds.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Enhancing auricular reconstruction: A biomimetic scaffold with 3D-printed multiscale porous structure utilizing chondrogenic activity ink.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- 3D-printed artificial bone scaffolds: the design of materials, the incorporation of bioactive substances, and the integration of vascularized tissue flaps.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- 3D bioprinting and mesenchymal stem cells: A bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and advancements.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital microtia is the most common cause of auricular defects, with a prevalence of approximately 5.18 per 10,000 individuals. Autologous rib cartilage grafting is the leading treatment modality at this stage of auricular reconstruction currently. However, harvesting rib cartilage may lead to donor site injuries, such as pneumothorax, postoperative pain, chest wall scarring, and deformity. Therefore, in the pursuit of better graft materials, biomaterial scaffolds with great histocompatibility, precise control of morphology, non-invasiveness properties are gradually becoming a new research hotspot in auricular reconstruction. This review collectively presents the exploit and application of 3D printing biomaterial scaffold in auricular reconstruction. Although the tissue-engineered ear still faces challenges before it can be widely applied to patients in clinical settings, and its long-term effects have yet to be evaluated, we aim to provide guidance for future research directions in 3D printing biomaterial scaffold for auricular reconstruction. This will ultimately benefit the translational and clinical application of cartilage tissue engineering and biomaterials in the treatment of auricular defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.