Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045286›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Coverage with evidence development program on stereotactic body radiotherapy in Belgium (2013-2019): a nationwide registry-based prospective study.

Yolande Lievens, Sharon Janssens, Maarten Lambrecht, Hilde Engels, Xavier Geets, Nicolas Jansen, Luigi Moretti, Vincent Remouchamps, Sander Roosens, Karin Stellamans and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lung metastases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yolande LievensRadiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sharon JanssensBelgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
Maarten LambrechtRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hilde EngelsBelgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier GeetsRadiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas JansenRadiation Oncology Department, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Luigi MorettiRadiation Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Vincent RemouchampsRadiation Oncology Department, CHU UCL, Namur, Site Sainte Elisabeth, Belgium.
Sander RoosensBelgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium.
Karin StellamansRadiation Oncology Department, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Dirk VerellenRadiation Oncology Department Iridium Netwerk/University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Caroline WeltensRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Reinhilde WeytjensRadiation Oncology Department Iridium Netwerk/University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Nancy Van DammeBelgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.
Belgian College for Physicians of Radiation Oncology Centres

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was progressively adopted in clinical practice in Belgium, a reimbursement request in 2011 was not granted because of remaining clinical and economic uncertainty. A coverage with evidence development (CED) program on SBRT started in 2013, with the aim to assess clinical and technical patterns-of-care in Belgium and monitor survival per indication, in view of supporting inclusion in the reimbursement system. Methods: The Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) initiated this prospective observational registry. Participating departments, using SBRT in clinical practice, signed the 'NIHDI convention'. Eligible patients had a primary tumour (PT) or oligometastatic disease (OMD). Patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected through an online module of the Belgian Cancer Registry, prerequisite for financing. Five-year overall survival (5YOS) and 30- and 90-days mortality were primary outcomes, derived from vital status information. Findings: Between 10/2013 and 12/2019, 20 of the 24 accredited radiotherapy departments participated, 6 were academic. Registered cases per department ranged from 21 to 867. Of 5675 registrations analysed, the majority had good performance status and limited number of lesions. Enrolment of PTs remained stable over time, OMDs almost doubled. Peripheral lung lesions dominated in PTs as in OMDs. Other metastases were (para)spinal, 'non-standard' and hepatic. Thirty- and 90-days mortalities remained below 0.5% [95% CI 0.3%-0.8%] respectively 2.1% [95% CI 1.6%-2.7%]. 5YOS varied by indication, primary prostate patients performing best (85%, 95% CI [76%, 96%]), those with liver metastases worst (19%, 95% CI [15%, 24%]). Better OS was observed in academic departments, department size did not significantly impact survival. OMD survival was better in 2018-19. Interpretation: CED can be used to define patterns-of-care and real-life outcome of innovative radiotherapy. As the observed survival for different indications was in line with outcome in emerging literature, SBRT was included in the Belgian reimbursement system as of January 2020. Funding: NIHDI financed participating departments per registered case.

Indexed as

Coverage with evidence developmentImplementationInnovationRadiotherapyReal-world dataStereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39045286
PMCPMC11265534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.