ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Assessing vaginal microbiome through Vaginal Microecology Evaluation System as a predictor for
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07278024 (To Investigate the Effect of Postbiotic Intervention on Vaginal Microbiota in Infertile Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
To Investigate the Effect of Postbiotic Intervention on Vaginal Microbiota in Infertile Women
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative determination of vaginal diamines as a biomarker for vaginal dysbiosis and IVF-ET outcome.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Vaginal microbiota in assisted reproduction: determinants, dynamics, and impact on clinical outcomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Targeted Vaginal Microbiome Modulation by Postbiotic Intervention Reduces Dysbiosis-Associated Pathogens in Infertile Women: A Pilot Study.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vaginal Microecology Evaluation System (VMES) in assessing the dynamics of the vaginal microbiome (VM) throughout the process of Methods: This study employed VMES to ascertain the composition of the VM. Data were collected from infertile women who underwent their initial IVF-ET treatment for tubal factor between January 2018 and December 2021. A retrospective analysis of pregnancy outcomes resulting from their fresh embryo transfer was conducted to determine the predictive significance of the vaginal microenvironment. Results: We demonstrate that VMES is able to predict IVF-ET outcomes in patients diagnosed with Bacterial Vaginosis (BV). Notably, a discernible shift in the VM was observed in a decent subset of patients following Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS), though this phenomenon was not universal across all participants. Specifically, there was a noteworthy increase in the proportion of patients exhibiting BV and uncharacterized dysbiosis subsequent to COS. Furthermore, our investigation revealed a significant correlation between VM and both the live birth rate and early miscarriage rate. Employing a multivariable logistic regression model, we identified that VM status pre-COS, VM status post-COS, patient age, and the number of embryos transferred emerged as independent predictors of the live birth rate. Conclusion: Our study suggests that, during IVF-ET treatment, the VMES can effectively detect changes in the VM, which are strongly correlated with the pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.