ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Antimicrobial susceptibility in
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The underappreciated role of rifampin in shaping the epidemiology of RT027-like Clostridioides difficile lineages.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Increase inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Molecular Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Methods: Samples were cultured for Results: Fidaxomicin was the most active antimicrobial (all isolates geometric mean MIC = 0.03 mg/L) with no evidence of reduced susceptibility. Metronidazole MICs were elevated among RT027 (1.87 mg/L) and RT181 clinical isolates (1.03 mg/L). RT027 and RT181 had elevated geometric mean moxifloxacin MICs (14.49 mg/L, 16.88 mg/L); clindamycin (7.5 mg/L, 9.1 mg/L) and rifampicin (0.6 mg/L, 21.5 mg/L). Five isolates (RT002, RT010 and RT016) were metronidazole resistant (MIC = 8 mg/L) and 10 (RT027; RT198) had intermediate resistance (4 mg/L). Metronidazole MICs were not elevated in animal isolates. Increased geometric mean vancomycin MICs were observed among RT078, mostly isolated from animals, but there was no resistance (MIC ≥ 4 mg/L). Clinical and animal isolates of multiple RTs showed resistance to moxifloxacin and clindamycin. No resistance to imipenem or meropenem was observed. Conclusion: Increased antimicrobial resistance was detected in eastern Europe and mostly associated with RT027 and related emerging RT181, while clinical isolates from northern and western Europe had the lowest general levels of resistance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.