ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Patterns of community antibiotic use with reference to the AWaRe classification of the World Health Organization.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Access to Watch: An AWaRe-Oriented Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing in ASL Salerno.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antibiotic prescriptions in Lombardy Region according to WHO AWaRe classification: trend from 2000 to 2024.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance Dynamics Across Healthcare Level: Global Evidence and Stewardship Implications.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of antibiotic prescription indexes by patient and physician gender and age: a cross-sectional study based on administrative data.BMC primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Monitoring consumption through quality indicators and providing feedback is an important activity within programmes for improving antibiotic prescription. This study aims to describe the use of antibiotics for systemic use in community setting in Italy and to compare prescription patterns among regions based on quality prescription indicators to identify any inter-regional variability. Methods: The 2021 consumption (calculated as DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day) of antibiotics for systemic use (reimbursed or purchased privately) in community setting were considered. The WHO AWaRe system was used to classify antibiotics into Access, Watch and Reserve groups, using the 60% of prescribed antibiotics belonging to the Access group out of the total DDDs as AWaRe target. The correlation between regional consumption and percentages of DDDs in the Access group was assessed through linear regression. A further indicator 'ratio of broad to narrow-spectrum antibacterials' was also calculated to compare the spectrum of prescribed antibiotics. Findings: Overall community antibiotic consumption in Italy in 2021 was 15.6 DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day, with an increasing trend from north (13.0 DDDs) to south (19.5 DDDs) and the percentages of non-reimbursed consumption decreasing from north (33.1%) to south (21.5%). Only three regions out of 21 reached the AWaRe target (regional range 47.4%-62.9%), with a negative correlation between regional consumption and percentages of antibiotics belonging to the Access group (correlation coefficient -0.8; Conclusion: The percentage of consumption of Access group antibiotics correlates very well with regional consumption in Italy, indicating that regions with higher antibiotics consumption also have worse prescribing patterns with a greater impact on bacterial resistance. Additional data are needed to better describe prescription patterns from an antimicrobial stewardship perspective.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.