ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
Exploring the Interplay of Diabetes, Deaf Patient Reported Outcomes, and Cancer Screening in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Women.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guideline-concordant cancer screening among Deaf, DeafBlind, and Hard of Hearing (DDBHH) Puerto Ricans who use American Sign Language.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cancer beliefs, risk perceptions, and health protective behaviors among people living with diabetes in the United States: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Some deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) individuals face health information barriers, increasing their risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and subsequent cancer development. This study examines if health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and deaf patient-reported outcomes (DHH-QoL) mediate the relationship between DM diagnosis and cancer screening adherence among DHH individuals. Patients and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, US DHH adults assigned female at birth answered questions on cervical and breast cancer screenings from the ASL-English bilingual Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-ASL) and the PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) Deaf Profile measure's Communication Health and Global Health domains. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from multivariable logistic and linear regression models, examining the association between DM, DHH-QoL, and cancer screening adherence, adjusting for other covariates and HRQoL. A Baron and Kenny causal mediation analysis was used. A two-sided p < 0.05 indicated significance. Results: Most respondents were White (66.4%), heterosexual (66.2%), did not have DM (83.9%), had health insurance (95.5%), and adhered to pap smears (75.7%) and mammograms (76.9%). The average (standard deviation) DHH-QoL score was 50.9 (8.6). Those with DM had lower HRQoL scores (46.2 (9.5) vs 50.2 (8.8); p < 0.0001) than those without. Non-significant multivariable models indicate that those with DM were more adherent to pap testing (OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.72, 3.03; p = 0.285) and mammograms (2.18; 95% CI: 0.81, 5.88; p = 0.122), with DHH-QoL scores slightly increasing them to 1.53 (0.74, 3.16; p = 0.250) for pap testing and 2.55 (0.91, 7.13; p = 0.076) for mammograms. DHH-QoL was significantly associated with mammograms (p = 0.027), with 6% increased adherence per unit increase in the score. Overall, HRQoL and DHH-QoL were not significant mediators. Conclusion: While HRQoL/DHH-QoL in DHH individuals with DM does not mediate cancer screening adherence, higher DHH-QoL scores are associated with it. DHH-focused health literacy and communication training can improve cancer-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.