ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2024
The importance of patient characteristics, operators, and image quality for the accuracy of heart failure diagnosis by general practitioners using handheld ultrasound devices.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated quality indicators for echocardiographic recordings and measurements: consequences for left ventricular global longitudinal strain.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- The promise and pitfalls of focused cardiac ultrasound among general practitioners.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate whether the characteristics of patients, operators, and image quality could explain the accuracy of heart failure (HF) diagnostics by general practitioners (GPs) using handheld ultrasound devices (HUDs) with automatic decision-support software and telemedical support. Methods and results: Patients referred to an outpatient cardiac clinic due to symptoms indicating HF were examined by one of five GPs after dedicated training. In total, 166 patients were included [median (inter-quartile range) age 73 (63-78) years; mean ± standard deviation ejection fraction 53 ± 10%]. The GPs considered whether the patients had HF in four diagnostic steps: (i) clinical examination, (ii) adding focused cardiac HUD examination, (iii) adding automatic decision-support software measuring mitral annular plane systolic excursion (autoMAPSE) and ejection fraction (autoEF), and (iv) adding telemedical support. Overall, the characteristics of patients, operators, and image quality explained little of the diagnostic accuracy. Except for atrial fibrillation [lower accuracy for HUD alone and after adding autoEF ( Conclusion: The characteristics of patients, operators, and image quality explained just minor parts of the modest accuracy of GPs' HF diagnostics using HUDs with and without decision-support software. Atrial fibrillation and not well-standardized recordings challenged the diagnostic accuracy. However, the accuracy was only modest in well-recorded images, indicating a need for refinement of the technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.