ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2024
Atrial function after percutaneous occluder device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of left atrial function following patent foramen ovale closure using four-dimensional auto left atrial quantification.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Impact of Post-Procedural Atrial Arrhythmia on Long-Term Cardiac Function and Quality of Life Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure.Cardiology research · 2025Article
- Retrospective Comparison of Device Versus Suture for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure.Heart international · 2025Article
- Article
- Speckle tracking echocardiographic prediction of atrial fibrillation after patent foramen ovale closure: a challenging matter.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure is a recent technique, achieving closure by means of a simple suture. The differences between traditional occluders and suture might have different impacts on atrial function. The aim of this study was to evaluate atrial function after PFO closure by direct suture and traditional occluders. Methods and results: We prospectively studied 40 patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by occluder and 20 by suture. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was carried out the day before and 1 year after the procedure. Left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) function was evaluated by using speckle-tracking analysis assessing the strain values of the reservoir (st-RES), conduit (st-CD), and contraction phase (st-CT). Compared with values baseline PFO closure, at 1-year follow-up, patients with occluder implantation had significantly worse indices of LA and RA reservoir (LA st-RES Conclusion: Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter atrial function. Conversely, PFO closure by metallic occluders is associated with a deterioration of atrial function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favour the development of atrial arrhythmias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.