Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045150›Full record

ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2024

Accumulation and removal of

Anne Breivik, Aida Mulic, Amer Sehic, Håkon Rukke Valen, Simen Kopperud, Linda Stein, Qalbi Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne BreivikInland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
Aida MulicNordic Institute of Dental Materials, Oslo, Norway.
Amer SehicFaculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Håkon Rukke ValenNordic Institute of Dental Materials, Oslo, Norway.
Simen KopperudNordic Institute of Dental Materials, Oslo, Norway.
Linda SteinDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Qalbi KhanInland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively investigate the accumulation of Methods: Eight sound premolars were embedded in epoxy resin and polished with silicon carbide grinding papers to display enamel and root surfaces. To mimic biofilm, cultures of Results: The ability to grow biofilm was equally present at both the enamel and root surfaces. The use of water and 40% experimental toothpaste showed a significant reduction of areas covered with biofilm on both enamel and root dentin in comparison to untreated surfaces ( Conclusion: The results indicate that less biofilm is removed from the root surfaces than enamel by the use of water and 40% experimental toothpaste in flow chamber. Assessing oral biofilm accumulation and monitoring biofilm formation on enamel and root dentin surfaces give oral health professionals important directions that could strenghten the significance of dental caries prevention. Improving older individuals' oral hygiene practices should therefore be considered an important measure to prevent root caries.

Indexed as

Biofilm removalenamelrootroot cariesStreptococcus mutans

Identifiers

PMID39045150
PMCPMC11265501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.