Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39045096›Full record

ArticleAddiction research & theory2024

Measuring recovery capital for people recovering from alcohol and drug addiction: A systematic review.

Adela Bunaciu, Ana-Maria Bliuc, David Best, Emily A Hennessy, Matthew Belanger, Christopher Benwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction research & theory, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recovery capital: a concept analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Recovery capital profiles among a heterogeneous sample of individuals in recovery from alcohol problems.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adela BunaciuDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Ana-Maria BliucDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
David BestCentre for Addiction Recovery Research, Leeds Trinity University.
Emily A HennessyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, United States.
Matthew BelangerDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Christopher BenwellDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

Funding

Mechanisms of social identity, social networks, and recovery capital: Implicationsfor recoveryK01AA028536 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI HENNESSY, EMILY A · 2020 to 2024
$895k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA028536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recovery capital theory provides a biopsychosocial framework for identifying and measuring strengths and barriers that can be targeted to support recovery from alcohol and drug addiction. This systematic review analyzed and synthesized all quantitative approaches that have measured recovery capital since 2016. Method: Three databases were searched to identify studies published from 2016 to 2023. Eligible studies explicitly stated they measured recovery capital in participants recovering from alcohol and/or drug addiction. Studies focusing on other forms of addiction were excluded. Results: Sixty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Forty-six studies used one of the ten identified recovery capital questionnaires, and twenty-five studies used a measurement approach other than one of the ten recovery capital questionnaires. The ten recovery capital questionnaires are primarily developed for adult populations across clinical and community recovery settings, and between them measure 41 separate recovery capital constructs. They are generally considered valid and reliable measures of recovery capital. Nevertheless, a strong evidence base on the psychometric properties across diverse populations and settings still needs to be established for these questionnaires. Conclusion: The development of recovery capital questionnaires has been a significant advance in the field of addiction recovery, in alignment with the emerging recovery-oriented approach to addiction recovery care. Additionally, the non-recovery capital questionnaire-based approaches to recovery capital measurement have an important place in the field. They could be used alongside recovery capital questionnaires to test theory, and in contexts where the application of the questionnaires is not feasible, such as analyses of data from online recovery forums.

Indexed as

alcoholdrugsrecoveryRecovery capitalrecovery measurementsubstance addiction

Identifiers

PMID39045096
PMCPMC11262562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.