Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044971›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Exploring the Interplay of problematic pornography use, sexism, and rape myth acceptance: An Italian cross-sectional study.

Benedetta Barchielli, Clarissa Cricenti, Giulia Lausi, Alessandro Quaglieri, Emanuela Mari, Gabriele Rocca, Arije Antinori, Anna Maria Giannini, Stefano Ferracuti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benedetta BarchielliDepartment of Human Neuroscience, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Clarissa CricentiDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Giulia LausiDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Alessandro QuaglieriDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Emanuela MariDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Gabriele RoccaDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Criminology, University of Genoa, Italy.
Arije AntinoriDepartment of Human Neuroscience, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria GianniniDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Stefano FerracutiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationships among pornography use, sexist ideology and false or stereotypical ideas about rape are controversial. This study specifically examines the associations of problematic pornography use (PPU) with sexism and rape myth acceptance among both male and female participants within the Italian context utilizing a cross-sectional methodology. Based on data from 815 participants collected through an online questionnaire, the study identifies significant gender-based differences, with men typically exhibiting higher scores on sexism, rape myth acceptance, and token resistance beliefs. Correlation analysis revealed that in men, there was a positive relationship between pornography cravings and sexist beliefs but not between pornography cravings and minimizing rape or accusations of lying (rape myth). Women showed significant positive correlations across all problematic pornography use dimensions with sexist ideology, although the relationship with rape myth acceptance varied. These findings underscore the critical need for acknowledging these relationships to enhance strategies for preventing gender-based violence.

Indexed as

PornographyRape myth acceptanceSexismSexuality issues

Identifiers

PMID39044971
PMCPMC11263655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.