ReviewConsortium psychiatricum2022
Revisiting Social Stigma in Non-suicidal Self-injury: A Narrative Review.
Review in Consortium psychiatricum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global, Regional, and National Burden of Self-Harm and Projections to 2030: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Adverse childhood experiences and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: the roles of depressive symptoms and teacher care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The relationship between public stigma, self-stigma, and non-suicidal self-injury in outpatient adolescents: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Profiles of caregiver burden among adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- From prevalent to personal: how social exposure predicts attitudes toward non-suicidal self-injury and what prevalence reveals.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The emotional surge: in-depth qualitative exploration of rumination and emotional turbulence in non-suicidal self-injurers.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Using the modified socio-ecological model to address stigma against non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents in Malaysia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- HERE-Bi: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Self-Esteem Intervention for Young Bisexual People to Reduce Non-Suicidal Self-Injury.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is highly prevalent in our community. Yet, there is a significant discrepancy between the number of individuals engaging in NSSI and those who seek treatment for NSSI. This discrepancy can be due to the high social stigma associated with the behavior. The impact of NSSI stigma is significant and can impair the quality of life in the individuals engaging in NSSI, delay help-seeking, reduce access to mental health care and further fuel misinformation. Even though the symptomatology, risks, and demographics of NSSI have received attention in terms of research, there is limited literature on NSSI stigma and its consequences. With that background set, this review provides a bird's-eye view of the different levels of stigma in NSSI (public, self, and health care), associated discrimination, the various aspects of such stigmatization (NSSI-related language, physical scarring, misinformation, the media), and, finally, the collaborative clinical-outreach interventions for mitigating NSSI-associated social stigma. If NSSI is indeed recognized as a clinical disorder, future research would need to focus on these constructs of stigma and treat them with the same importance as the one given to clinical studies of intervention and symptomatology in NSSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.