Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044796›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2023

Virtual cardiovascular magnetic resonance training proves feasible and effective: survey data from international participants of the CMR Academy Berlin, Germany.

Djawid Hashemi, Patrick Doeblin, Karl Jakob Weiss, Matthias Schneider-Reigbert, Rebecca Elisabeth Beyer, Corinna Else, Alessandro Faragli, Christian Stehning, Philipp Stawowy, Steffen E Petersen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Djawid HashemiDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3933-7092
Patrick DoeblinDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Karl Jakob WeissDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Matthias Schneider-ReigbertDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Rebecca Elisabeth BeyerDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Corinna ElseDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Alessandro FaragliCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Christian StehningClinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany.
Philipp StawowyDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Steffen E PetersenWilliam Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Chiara Bucciarelli-DucciRoyal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guys' and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Allison G HaysDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Norbert FreyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Holger ThieleHeart Center Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0169-998X
Andreas PortmannStiftung Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Augustenburger Pl. 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Eckart FleckCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian KelleDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the success of the cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging Academy Berlin's transition from in-person to online CMR imaging training during the global pandemic 2020 and to gather recommendations for future courses. Methods and results: We conducted an online survey targeting CMR course participants from both the pre-pandemic, in-person era and the pandemic, online era of the CMR Academy Berlin. The survey primarily used Likert-type questions to assess participants' experiences and preferences.A total of 61 out of 158 invited participants (38.61%) completed the survey, with 31 (50.82%) being in-person alumni and 30 (49.18%) being online alumni. Both in-person [83.87% (26/31)] and online [83.33% (25/30)] participants rated the course as either 'very good' or 'excellent', and both groups found the course either 'extremely helpful' or 'very helpful'. However, a higher percentage of in-person participants [96.77% (30/31)] felt comfortable asking questions compared to online participants [83.33% (25/30); Conclusion: The transition from in-person to online CMR training at the CMR Academy Berlin was successful in maintaining overall satisfaction. However, there is room for improvement in terms of increased interaction, particularly for online participants. Future CMR- and potentially also cardiac computer tomography-courses should consider adopting a hybrid format to accommodate participants' preferences and enhance their learning experience, especially to gain level II competency, whereas level I virtual only might be sufficient.

Indexed as

cardiologycardiovascular magnetic resonance imagingcertificationCMRonline educationqualityradiologyremote education

Identifiers

PMID39044796
PMCPMC11240162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.