Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044674›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Origin and maintenance of large ribosomal RNA gene repeat size in mammals.

Emma Macdonald, Annabel Whibley, Paul D Waters, Hardip Patel, Richard J Edwards, Austen R D Ganley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Assessing Human Ribosomal DNA Variation and Its Association With Phenotypic Outcomes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma MacdonaldSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Annabel WhibleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Paul D WatersSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Chancellery Walk, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia.
Hardip PatelJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, 131 Garran Rd, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Richard J EdwardsSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Chancellery Walk, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia.
Austen R D GanleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1917-7522

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery Projects DP210103512Genomics Aotearoa High Quality Genomes and Population Genomics ProjectMedical Research Futures FundMRFF 2016008National Health and Medical Research CouncilNew Zealand Marsden Fund 14-MAU-053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genes encoding ribosomal RNA are highly conserved across life and in almost all eukaryotes are present in large tandem repeat arrays called the rDNA. rDNA repeat unit size is conserved across most eukaryotes but has expanded dramatically in mammals, principally through the expansion of the intergenic spacer region that separates adjacent rRNA coding regions. Here, we used long-read sequence data from representatives of the major amniote lineages to determine where in amniote evolution rDNA unit size increased. We find that amniote rDNA unit sizes fall into two narrow size classes: "normal" (∼11-20 kb) in all amniotes except monotreme, marsupial, and eutherian mammals, which have "large" (∼35-45 kb) sizes. We confirm that increases in intergenic spacer length explain much of this mammalian size increase. However, in stark contrast to the uniformity of mammalian rDNA unit size, mammalian intergenic spacers differ greatly in sequence. These results suggest a large increase in intergenic spacer size occurred in a mammalian ancestor and has been maintained despite substantial sequence changes over the course of mammalian evolution. This points to a previously unrecognized constraint on the length of the intergenic spacer, a region that was thought to be largely neutral. We finish by speculating on possible causes of this constraint.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMammalsAnimalsDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerGenes, rRNAHumansPhylogenyDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpaceramniotesIGSintergenic spacermammalsrDNAribosomal DNAribosomal RNA gene repeats

Identifiers

PMID39044674
PMCPMC11373518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.