Successful iatrogenic duodenal perforation treatment with endoscopic hand suturing.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Endoscopic Hand Suturing After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Low to Intermediate Risk of Delayed Bleeding: A Retrospective Pilot Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
   Observational
2. Duodenal Trauma: Mechanisms of Injury, Diagnosis, and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
   Review
3. Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
   Review
4. Endoscopic hand suturing after advanced endoscopic procedures: early outcomes of 31 cases in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract (with video).Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.