Trial reportThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2024
Pre-Randomization Predictors of Study Discontinuation in a Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Re-evaluation of the efficacy and safety of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (lecanemab/donanemab) in the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Recruitment and retention in a preclinical AD trial: comparisons between academic and non-academic sites.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Trial
- Research satisfaction among participants in a preclinical Alzheimer's disease trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Multimodal Integration of Gait Dysfunction, Amyloid PET, and Plasma Biomarkers for Differentiating Etiological Subtypes in Mild Cognitive Impairment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Evaluating evidence-based recruitment strategies for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias clinical trial research: A literature review.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Review
- Development and Implementation of a Radiation Safety Screening Protocol for a Clinical Study Using Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.Ochsner journal · 2026Article
- Solving the 'Goldilocks problem' in dementia clinical trials with multimodal AI.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Characterizing the Research Participant Recruitment Funnel for Alzheimer's Secondary Prevention Trials: Results from A National Survey of U.S. Adults.Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging · 2025Article
- Potential of low-field MRI for increasing participation of Filipino Americans and underrepresented populations in Alzheimer's and dementia research.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParticipant discontinuation from study treatment in a clinical trial can leave a trial underpowered, produce bias in statistical analysis, and limit interpretability of study results. Retaining participants in clinical trials for the full study duration is therefore as important as participant recruitment.
objectiveThis analysis aims to identify associations of pre-randomization characteristics of participants with premature discontinuation during the blinded phase of the Anti-Amyloid treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) Study.
designAll A4 trial randomized participants were classified as having prematurely discontinued study during the blinded period of the study for any reason (dropouts) or completed the blinded phase of the study on treatment (completers).
settingThe trial was conducted across 67 study sites in the United States, Canada, Japan and Australia through the global COVID-19 pandemic.
participantsThe sample consisted of all 1169 A4 trial randomized participants. MEASUREMENTS: Pre-randomization demographic, clinical, amyloid PET and genetic predictors of study discontinuation were evaluated using a univariate generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), with discontinuation status as the binary outcome, each predictor as a fixed effect, and site as a random effect to account for differences among study sites in the trial. Characteristics significant at p<0.10 were then included in a multivariable GLMM.
resultsAmong randomized participants, 339 (29%) discontinued the study during the blinded period (median follow-up time in trial: 759 days). From the multivariable analysis, the two main predictors of study discontinuation were screening State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores (OR = 1.07 [95%CI = 1.02; 1.12]; p=0.002) and age (OR = 1.06 [95%CI = 1.03; 1.09]; p<0.001). Participants with a family history of dementia (OR = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.55; 1.01]; p=0.063) and APOE ε4 carriers (OR = 0.79 [95%CI = 0.6; 1.04]; p=0.094) were less likely to discontinue from the study, with the association being marginally significant. In these analyses, sex, race and ethnicity, cognitive scores and amyloid/tau PET scores were not associated with study dropout.
conclusionsIn the A4 trial, older participants and those with higher levels of anxiety at baseline as measured by the STAI were more likely to discontinue while those who had a family history of dementia or were APOE ε4 carriers were less likely to drop out. These findings have direct implications for future preclinical trial design and selection processes to identify those individuals at greatest risk of dropout and provide information to the study team to develop effective selection and retention strategies in AD prevention studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.