Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044450›Full record

ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health

The Availability of Midwifery Care in Rural United States Communities.

Emily C Sheffield, Alyssa H Fritz, Julia D Interrante, Katy Backes Kozhimannil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Local availability of neonatal intensive care at rural hospitals with childbirth services.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Rural-urban differences in health care access for postpartum parent and infant dyads.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  6. State Midwifery Full Practice Authority Policies and Midwife-Attended Births Among Rural and Urban U.S. Residents.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily C SheffieldUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0008-7355-3219
Alyssa H FritzUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Julia D InterranteUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Katy Backes KozhimannilUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Federal Office of Rural Health PolicyHRSA HHSNICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023US Department of Health and Human Services 5U1CRH03717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccess to pregnancy-related and childbirth-related health care for rural residents is limited by health workforce shortages in the United States. Although midwives are key pregnancy and childbirth care providers, the current landscape of the rural midwifery workforce is not well understood. The goal of this analysis was to describe the availability of local midwifery care in rural US communities.

methodsWe developed and conducted a national survey of rural US hospitals with current or recently closed childbirth services. Maternity unit managers or administrators at 292 rural hospitals were surveyed from March to August 2021, with 133 hospitals responding (response rate 46%; 93 currently offering childbirth services, 40 recently closed childbirth services). This cross-sectional analysis describes whether rural hospitals with current or prior childbirth services had midwifery care with certified nurse-midwives available locally and whether rural communities with and without midwifery care differed by hospital-level and county-level characteristics.

resultsAmong hospitals surveyed, 55% of those with current and 75% of those with prior childbirth services reported no locally available midwifery care. Of the 93 rural communities with current hospital-based childbirth services, those without midwifery care were more likely to have lower populations (37% vs 33%); majority populations that were Black, Indigenous, and people of color (24% vs 10%); and hospitals where at least 50% of births were Medicaid funded (77% vs 64%), compared with communities with midwifery care. Conversely, communities with midwifery care more often had greater than 30% of patients traveling more than 30 miles for hospital-based childbirth services (38% vs 28%). DISCUSSION: More than half of rural hospitals surveyed reported no locally available midwifery care, and availability differed by hospital-level and county-level characteristics. Efforts to ensure pregnancy and childbirth care access for rural birthing people should include attention to the availability of local midwifery care.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyRural Health ServicesRural PopulationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, RuralHumansNurse MidwivesPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesbirthhealth workforcehospitalsmaternal health servicesmidwiferynurse‐midwivesruralrural health services

Identifiers

PMID39044450
PMCPMC11622357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.