ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024
Impact of racial disparities in follow-up and quality of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer outcomes.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Patient-centred approach to improve colorectal cancer screening (CRC) in resource-limited communities.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Is distance a barrier to postoperative follow-up? a cox proportion analysis of geographic, financial, and clinical factors in ventral hernia repair outcomes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- The triple effect of colorectal cancer screening: reducing deaths, government spending, and mortality disparities.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Exploring current cancer screening practices and guidelines for adults under age 50 in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Patient and clinical factors associated with postoperative follow-up duration after ventral hernia repair: a single-center retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Modeled Cost-Effectiveness of a Rideshare Program to Facilitate Colonoscopy Completion.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Disaggregated Colorectal Cancer Mortality among Asian American Subgroups between 2005 and 2020.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Disparity in Access to Physicians With High Adenoma Detection Rates.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
- Cancer statistics, 2026.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansArticle
- Cancer statistics, 2025.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs rely on completing follow-up colonoscopy when a noncolonoscopy test is abnormal and on quality of colonoscopy screening as measured by the endoscopists' adenoma detection rate. Existing data demonstrate substantially lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate for Black Americans than White Americans. However, the contributions of racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy and adenoma detection rate on CRC outcomes have not been rigorously evaluated.
methodsWe used established and validated CRC-Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model as our analysis platform, with inputs from published literature that report lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate in Black adults compared with White adults (15% and 10% lower, respectively). We simulated screening with annual fecal immunochemical test, triennial multitarget stool DNA, and colonoscopy every 10 years between ages 45 and 75 years using real-world utilization of the screening modalities vs no screening. We reported lifetime outcomes per 1000 Black adults.
resultsElimination of Black-White disparities in follow-up colonoscopy rates would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 5.2% and 9.3%, respectively, and improve life-years gained with screening by 3.4%. Elimination of Black-White disparities in endoscopists' adenoma detection rate would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 9.4% and improve life-years gained by 3.7%. Elimination of both disparities would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 14.6% and 18.7%, respectively, and improve life-years gained by 7.1%.
conclusionsThis modeling study predicts eliminating racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy rates, and quality of screening colonoscopy would substantially reduce Black-White disparities in CRC incidence and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.