Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044335›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024

Impact of racial disparities in follow-up and quality of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer outcomes.

Oguzhan Alagoz, Folasade P May, Chyke A Doubeni, A Mark Fendrick, Vahab Vahdat, Chris Estes, Travelle Ellis, Paul J Limburg, Durado Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Disaggregated Colorectal Cancer Mortality among Asian American Subgroups between 2005 and 2020.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Cancer statistics, 2026.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Article
  12. Cancer statistics, 2025.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oguzhan AlagozDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5133-1382
Folasade P MayDepartment of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Health and UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chyke A DoubeniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
A Mark FendrickDepartment of Internal Medicine and Department of Health Management and Policy, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vahab VahdatExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Chris EstesExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Travelle EllisExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Paul J LimburgExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Durado BrooksExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Advancing Equity in Cancer Care: Investigating Health- Related Social Needs and Colonoscopy Follow-Up Among FQHC PatientsR01CA278052 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS Allen CORLEY, Chyke Abadama Doubeni · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Exact SciencesNCI NIH HHS R01 CA278052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs rely on completing follow-up colonoscopy when a noncolonoscopy test is abnormal and on quality of colonoscopy screening as measured by the endoscopists' adenoma detection rate. Existing data demonstrate substantially lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate for Black Americans than White Americans. However, the contributions of racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy and adenoma detection rate on CRC outcomes have not been rigorously evaluated.

methodsWe used established and validated CRC-Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model as our analysis platform, with inputs from published literature that report lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate in Black adults compared with White adults (15% and 10% lower, respectively). We simulated screening with annual fecal immunochemical test, triennial multitarget stool DNA, and colonoscopy every 10 years between ages 45 and 75 years using real-world utilization of the screening modalities vs no screening. We reported lifetime outcomes per 1000 Black adults.

resultsElimination of Black-White disparities in follow-up colonoscopy rates would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 5.2% and 9.3%, respectively, and improve life-years gained with screening by 3.4%. Elimination of Black-White disparities in endoscopists' adenoma detection rate would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 9.4% and improve life-years gained by 3.7%. Elimination of both disparities would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 14.6% and 18.7%, respectively, and improve life-years gained by 7.1%.

conclusionsThis modeling study predicts eliminating racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy rates, and quality of screening colonoscopy would substantially reduce Black-White disparities in CRC incidence and mortality.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedUnited StatesWhite

Identifiers

PMID39044335
PMCPMC11542987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.