ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2024
Regression of cardiac angiosarcoma in a 17-year-old: a percutaneous biopsy effect.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical resection of a primary cardiac angiosarcoma and reconstruction of involved right atrium.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Cardiac Angiosarcoma in a 17-Year-Old Female: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac angiosarcoma is a very rare and aggressive primary cardiac tumor associated with poor prognosis. Diagnosis is often delayed due to non-specific symptoms, with most cases involving metastases at the time of diagnosis. We describe a unique case of apparent tumor regression of cardiac angiosarcoma post percutaneous biopsy. CASE PRESENTATION: A young male was admitted with suspected pericarditis. Echocardiogram revealed a pericardial mass. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) suggested primary cardiac malignancy. Percutaneous biopsy was inconclusive, with subsequent CMR demonstrating apparent tumor regression. Interval imaging revealed further tumor growth, and surgical biopsy revealed primary cardiac angiosarcoma (PCAS). Causes of tumor regression following percutaneous biopsy are discussed.
conclusionsCases of suspected primary cardiac malignancy require careful follow up with serial multimodality imaging. Percutaneous biopsy effects should be considered in cases of tumor regression, and serial imaging should be planned afterwards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.