ArticleGlobal health research and policy2024
The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Chinese expert consensus on prevention, diagnosis, and management of venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients (2024).Military Medical Research · 2025Guideline
- A delphi-based model for prognosis of femoral head collapse in osteonecrosis: a multi-factorial approach.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation on the efficiencies of centers for disease control and prevention in China: results from a 12-year national survey.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Construction of an evaluation indicator system for humanistic care quality in nursing homes.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Developing a Service Quality Index System for AI Health Care Chatbots: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Developing a Quality Evaluation Index System for Health Conversational Artificial Intelligence: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Predicting Gram-negative bloodstream infection in elderly patients after isolation of GNB from non-blood specimens: a machine learning-based tool.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- "Who Are You": development of a holistic, social-emotionally grounded curriculum framework using the Delphi technique.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Close-Knit Medical Alliances on the Integration of HIV Prevention and Treatment in County-Level Areas in China: Protocol for a Delphi Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Developing a quality indicator system for pediatric clinical trials management of research centers in China: a modified Delphi-Analytic Hierarchy Process study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Developing a Health Education Checklist for Healthcare Professionals to Ensure Treatment Adherence of Newly Diagnosed Young People Living with HIV: A Delphi Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe performance evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is crucial for enhancing the quality of public health services. With the ongoing reform of the CDC system in China, the existing performance evaluation system faces challenges. This study used the Delphi method to develop a new performance evaluation system for China's provincial, city, and county-level CDC.
methodsFollowing the "Structure-Process-Outcome" model, assessment indicators were systematically collected. Indicators were modified and screened through two Delphi rounds based on CDC responsibilities, health development, and national policies. Twenty-four experts provided ratings and recommendations, and the research team evaluated questionnaire reliability, expert positivity, expert authority, and opinion consistency.
resultsThe preliminary index system identified through the literature review and pre-survey included 11 primary, 30 secondary, and 64 tertiary indicators. After the first round of consultation, two secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and 22 tertiary indicators were added. After the second round of consultation, three secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and three tertiary indicators were added, at which point the p-value of the test for Kendall's coefficient of concordance W was < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation was within acceptable limits (< 0.25), so the consultation was concluded. The final index system included 11 primary, 25 secondary, and 67 tertiary indicators.
conclusionsThis study responded to the CDC system reform by developing a comprehensive performance evaluation index system for provincial, city, and county-level CDC in China. The index system is both scientifically grounded and practical, serving as an effective tool for promoting the high-quality work of CDC organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.