Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044178›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Use of autologous tooth-derived material as a graft in the post-extraction socket. Split-mouth study with radiological and histological analysis.

H López Sacristán, M Del Canto Pingarrón, M A Alobera Gracia, J de Elío Oliveros, R Díaz Pedrero, J Seco-Calvo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07608289 (Socket Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autogenous Dentin in Comparison With Other Techniques), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07608289 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Socket Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autogenous Dentin in Comparison With Other Techniques

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OstravaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsTooth Extraction Site HealingArmsTooth extraction left to heal spontaneously, Tooth extraction plus collagen sponge, Tooth extraction plus tricalcium phosphate, Tooth extraction plus autogenous dentin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H López SacristánMaster's in Oral Surgery, Implant Dentistry, and Periodontics, University of León, Avenida de Valladolid 2, Primera Planta Oficina 3., Aldeamayor de San Martin, Valladolid, 47162, Spain. hernan32.hl@gmail.com.
M Del Canto PingarrónHead of the Master's programme, Master's in Oral Surgery, Implant Dentistry, and Periodontics, University of León, León, Spain.
M A Alobera GraciaHead of the Master's programme, Master's in Oral Surgery, Implant Dentistry, and Periodontics, University of León, León, Spain.
J de Elío OliverosMaster's in Oral Surgery, Implant Dentistry, and Periodontics, University of León, Avenida de Valladolid 2, Primera Planta Oficina 3., Aldeamayor de San Martin, Valladolid, 47162, Spain.
R Díaz PedreroDepartment of Morphological Sciences and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
J Seco-CalvoInstitute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of León, León, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe healing process after tooth removal involves bone remodelling which implies some loss of alveolar bone volume. Among materials proposed for minimising this remodelling and preserving the bone, autologous dental tissue is a promising option, but more data are needed. In this context, we evaluated size and density changes using cone beam computed tomography in autologous dental material (ADM)-preserved sockets compared to controls, and assessed biological responses by histological analysis.

methodsA split-mouth study was conducted including 22 patients, who underwent removal of ≥ 2 single-rooted teeth with intact sockets, assigning one socket to the experimental group which received ADM for alveolar preservation and another to the control group, which only underwent blood clot stabilisation. Cone beam computed tomography was performed postoperatively (week 0) and at weeks 8 and 16 to assess socket size and bone density. Histological analysis was carried out on trephine biopsies taken (Ø4 × 4.5 mm) from the experimental group.

resultsLess horizontal shrinkage was observed in the ADM group, especially at week 16 considering the group-by-time interaction for the following variables: difference in height between the lingual and buccal alveolar crests (-1.00; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.28 - -1.73), and half-widths, measured as the distance from the long axis of the missing tooth to the buccal alveolar crest at 1 mm (-0.61; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.18 - -1.04) and at 3 mm (-0.56; p < .01; 95% CI: -0.15 - -0.97) below the crest, with mean decreases of 1.07 and 2.14 mm in height difference, 0.66 and 1.32 mm in half-width at 1 mm and 0.43 and 1.02 mm in half-width at 3 mm in ADM and control groups respectively. Densitometry analysis showed higher bone densities in Hounsfield units in the ADM group considering all factors analysed regardless of time point and socket third (coronal, middle, or apical). Histologically, there were no signs of inflammation or foreign body reaction, and dentin particles were surrounded by and in close contact with bone tissue.

conclusionThese results add to the evidence that dentin can be used successfully as a material for alveolar socket preservation, given its desirable mechanical and biological properties, and warrant larger studies.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyTooth ExtractionTooth SocketAdultAgedBone DensityBone RemodelingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAlveolar preservationAutologous dentin graftDentinDimensional changesHistologyPost-extraction socket

Identifiers

PMID39044178
PMCPMC11265360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.