ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2024
Beneficial therapeutic plasma exchange response in the treatment of severe relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Corticosteroid-Refractory Multiple Sclerosis Relapses: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Integration into Clinical Practice.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Shaping the role of plasma exchange in autoimmune neurology: lessons learned from 67 years and over 90,000 procedures.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTherapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is effective as a second-line treatment of severe relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS) that failed to respond to standard steroid therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of PLEX in the severe MS relapses in a cohort of patients treated at Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, from 2007 until 2020.
methodsThis retrospective study comprised 107 MS patients with 127 severe relapses treated with PLEX. Majority of our patients suffered from relapsing remitting MS (83.2%), 12.1% had secondary progressive MS and 4.7% had primary progressive MS. Mean age was 39.2 years (range, 19-79 years), female/male ratio 2.3:1. Pulse corticosteroid treatment was used before PLEX in 99.3% of patients. Median EDSS score at nadire during relapse was 6.0 (range 2.0-10.0). After PLEX, 73.8% relapses showed a marked clinical improvement, 7.1% showed mild improvement and in 19.0% there was no improvement. Median EDSS at discharge was 4.0 (6.0 at nadir of relapse vs. 4.0 at discharge; p<0.0001) and it was sustained at the same level, 6 month after PLEX. Multivariate regression analysis showed that higher EDSS at nadir during relapse (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.96, p=0.039) and older age (OR=1.07, 95% CI 1.02- 1.12, p=0.010) were significantly associated with poor treatment response after 6- month follow-up. Adverse events occurred in 17.3 of procedures and they were completely resolved.
conclusionOur study in a large cohort of MS patients confirmed that PLEX is effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39044118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.