Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044110›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2024

Dosing Adjustments in Cases of Altered Plasma Protein Binding are Most Needed for Drugs with a Volume of Distribution Below 1.3 L/kg.

Florin M Musteata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Florin M MusteataDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 106 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY, 12208, USA. marcel.musteata@acphs.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6143-2171

Funding

Foundation for the National Institutes of Health 1R15GM126510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present literature offers conflicting views on the importance of changes in plasma protein binding in clinical therapeutics. Furthermore, there are no methods to calculate a new dosing regimen when such changes occur.

methodsPrevious models developed by Balaz et al. and Greenblat et al. were used to calculate a plasma protein binding (PPB) score for individual drugs based on the volume of distribution for total concentration and the bound fraction of drug. The models were further used to calculate a new drug dosing interval for cases of altered plasma protein binding. The equations apply best for drugs with fast absorption and fast distribution; they can be used as approximations for drugs with slow distribution by using the volume of distribution at steady state and the rate constant of the elimination phase.

resultsThe newly developed equations show that changes in plasma protein binding are relevant only for drugs with a positive PPB score; such drugs must have a volume of distribution for total concentration below 1.3 L/kg and high protein binding. It is further shown that the drug dosing interval should be reduced when the remaining fraction of plasma protein binding is below the PPB score.

conclusionA new method to rank drugs according to the impact of changes in plasma protein binding on their pharmacokinetic profile was developed. The new method was applied to show that drugs with high PPB scores need reductions in their dosing interval when the level of protein binding decreases.

Indexed as

Blood ProteinsModels, BiologicalProtein BindingDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsTissue DistributionBlood ProteinsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.