ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2024
A combination of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and lung ultrasound to predict mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07114978 (Prognostic Value of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity-time Integral in Predicting In-hospital Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prognostic Value of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity-time Integral in Predicting In-hospital Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Cardiology: When a Positioning Statement Does Not Reflect the State of the ArtReplyPositioning Statement on the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Medicine - 2026.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
- In response to 'Integrated ultrasound haemodynamic profiling (VTI-VExUS) for risk stratification in acute heart failure'.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Integrated ultrasound haemodynamic profiling (VTI-VExUS) for risk stratification in acute heart failure.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- The rise of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary diagnostics.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- Clinical impact of a cardiothoracic ultrasound protocol in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the focused assessment in STEMI (FASTEMI) protocol.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- How we use critical care ultrasonography in the management of cardiogenic shock: a strategic game of chess in intensive care.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Point-of-care ultrasound in the evaluation of STEMI patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Prognostic role of pre-procedural lung ultrasound in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) Score in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction to Predict In-Hospital Mortality.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of ventricular failure and pulmonary edema is associated with a worse prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of a novel classification combining lung ultrasound (LUS) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) in patients with STEMI. LUS and LVOT-VTI were performed within 24 h of admission in STEMI patients. A LUS combined with LVOT-VTI (LUV) classification was developed based on LUS with < or ≥ 3 positive zone scans, combined with LVOT-VTI > or ≤ 14. Patients were classified as A (< 3zones/ > 14 cm VTI), B (≥ 3zones/ > 14 cm VTI), C (< 3zones/ ≤ 14 cm VTI) and D (≥ 3zones/ ≤ 14 cm VTI). Primary outcome was occurrence of in-hospital mortality. Development of cardiogenic shock (CS) within 24 h was also assessed. A total of 308 patients were included. Overall in-hospital mortality was 8.8%, while mortality for LUV A, B, C, and D was 0%, 3%, 12%, and 45%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.915. Moreover, after exclusion of patients admitted in Killip IV, at each increasing degree of LUV, a higher proportion of patients developed CS within 24 h: LUV A = 0.0%, LUV B 5%, LUV C = 12.5% and LUV D = 30.8% (p < 0.0001). The AUC for predicting CS was 0.908 (p < 0.001). In a cohort of STEMI patients, LUV provided to be an excellent method for prediction of in-hospital mortality and development of CS. LUV classification is a fast, non-invasive and very user-friendly ultrasonographic evaluation method to stratify the risk of mortality and CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39044051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.