ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Real-time prediction of postoperative spinal shape with machine learning models trained on finite element biomechanical simulations.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in biomechanical modeling of lumbar spine diseases and tumors: gaps, opportunities, and AI integration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- AI in Pediatric Spine Care: Clinical, Research, and Ethical Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing spine surgery with emerging AI-FEA integration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in postoperative orthopedic rehabilitation: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a chronic disease that may require correction surgery. The finite element method (FEM) is a popular option to plan the outcome of surgery on a patient-based model. However, it requires considerable computing power and time, which may discourage its use. Machine learning (ML) models can be a helpful surrogate to the FEM, providing accurate real-time responses. This work implements ML algorithms to estimate post-operative spinal shapes.
methodsThe algorithms are trained using features from 6400 simulations generated using the FEM from spine geometries of 64 patients. The features are selected using an autoencoder and principal component analysis. The accuracy of the results is evaluated by calculating the root-mean-squared error and the angle between the reference and predicted position of each vertebra. The processing times are also reported.
resultsA combination of principal component analysis for dimensionality reduction, followed by the linear regression model, generated accurate results in real-time, with an average position error of 3.75 mm and orientation angle error below 2.74 degrees in all main 3D axes, within 3 ms. The prediction time is considerably faster than simulations based on the FEM alone, which require seconds to minutes.
conclusionIt is possible to predict post-operative spinal shapes of patients with AIS in real-time by using ML algorithms as a surrogate to the FEM. Clinicians can compare the response of the initial spine shape of a patient with AIS to various target shapes, which can be modified interactively. These benefits can encourage clinicians to use software tools for surgical planning of scoliosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39044037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.