ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Improving lung nodule segmentation in thoracic CT scans through the ensemble of 3D U-Net models.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Lung Cancer Segmentation and Volumetric Analysis Using CT Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- CNN-RNN framework for lung cancer classification using CT imaging and GAN-based augmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Detection and classification of lung cancer using sequential hybridization of CNN and RNN type architectures.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- Multi-phase deep learning framework with Multiscale Adaptive Swin Transformer and embedding attention for precision lung nodule detection and classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deep learning-based computed tomography reading system for the diagnosis of lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe current study explores the application of 3D U-Net architectures combined with Inception and ResNet modules for precise lung nodule detection through deep learning-based segmentation technique. This investigation is motivated by the objective of developing a Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system for effective diagnosis and prognostication of lung nodules in clinical settings.
methodsThe proposed method trained four different 3D U-Net models on the retrospective dataset obtained from AIIMS Delhi. To augment the training dataset, affine transformations and intensity transforms were utilized. Preprocessing steps included CT scan voxel resampling, intensity normalization, and lung parenchyma segmentation. Model optimization utilized a hybrid loss function that combined Dice Loss and Focal Loss. The model performance of all four 3D U-Nets was evaluated patient-wise using dice coefficient and Jaccard coefficient, then averaged to obtain the average volumetric dice coefficient (DSC
resultsThe ensemble of models obtained the highest DSC
conclusionsThe suggested ensemble approach presents a strong and effective strategy for automatically detecting and delineating lung nodules, potentially aiding CAD systems in clinical settings. This approach could assist radiologists in laborious and meticulous lung nodule detection tasks in CT scans, improving lung cancer diagnosis and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39044036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.