Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39044035›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Using machine learning to combine genetic and environmental data for maize grain yield predictions across multi-environment trials.

Igor K Fernandes, Caio C Vieira, Kaio O G Dias, Samuel B Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving multi-trait genomic prediction using synthetic traits from hyperspectral data based on co-heritability.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  5. Yield-graph: multi-stage growth-aware maize yield prediction via graph neural networks.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  20. Improving plant breeding through AI-supported data integration.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Igor K FernandesDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Center for Agricultural Data Analytics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Caio C VieiraDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Kaio O G DiasDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Samuel B FernandesDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Center for Agricultural Data Analytics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. samuelbf@uark.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8269-535X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageIncorporating feature-engineered environmental data into machine learning-based genomic prediction models is an efficient approach to indirectly model genotype-by-environment interactions. Complementing phenotypic traits and molecular markers with high-dimensional data such as climate and soil information is becoming a common practice in breeding programs. This study explored new ways to combine non-genetic information in genomic prediction models using machine learning. Using the multi-environment trial data from the Genomes To Fields initiative, different models to predict maize grain yield were adjusted using various inputs: genetic, environmental, or a combination of both, either in an additive (genetic-and-environmental; G+E) or a multiplicative (genotype-by-environment interaction; GEI) manner. When including environmental data, the mean prediction accuracy of machine learning genomic prediction models increased up to 7% over the well-established Factor Analytic Multiplicative Mixed Model among the three cross-validation scenarios evaluated. Moreover, using the G+E model was more advantageous than the GEI model given the superior, or at least comparable, prediction accuracy, the lower usage of computational memory and time, and the flexibility of accounting for interactions by construction. Our results illustrate the flexibility provided by the ML framework, particularly with feature engineering. We show that the feature engineering stage offers a viable option for envirotyping and generates valuable information for machine learning-based genomic prediction models. Furthermore, we verified that the genotype-by-environment interactions may be considered using tree-based approaches without explicitly including interactions in the model. These findings support the growing interest in merging high-dimensional genotypic and environmental data into predictive modeling.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenotypeMachine LearningModels, GeneticPhenotypeZea maysEdible GrainEnvironmentGenomicsPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID39044035
PMCPMC11266441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.