ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
The morphometry of distal tibia and posterior malleolus and its clinical implications in total ankle prosthesis.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to reveal the morphometry of the distal tibia and posterior malleolus and to generate morphometric reference data for the tibial component of total ankle prosthesis.
methodsThis study was performed on 121 human dry tibiae (47 right, 74 left). The morphometric measurements of distal tibial structures, tibial length and the distance between the medial and posterior malleolus were measured in this study. Measurements on 44 tibiae were repeated three times and averaged for minimizing intra-observer error.
resultsThe tibial length was found 34.19 ± 2.31 cm. Mean values of width of fibular notch at tibial plafond and 10 mm proximal to the tibial plafond were 25.71 ± 2.44 mm and 17.81 ± 2.46 mm, respectively. Mean depth of fibular notch at tibial plafond and 10 mm proximal to the tibial plafond were 3.60 ± 1.04 mm and 3.37 ± 1.24 mm, respectively. Mean height of fibular notch was found 48.21 ± 10.51 mm. Mean width and height of medial malleolus were 25.08 ± 2.13 mm and 14.73 ± 1.85 mm, respectively. Mean width and length of tibial plafond were 27.71 ± 2.74 mm and 26.96 ± 2.62 mm, respectively. Mean values of width and height of posterior malleolus were measured 21.41 ± 3.26 mm and 6.74 ± 1.56 mm, respectively. Mean distance between medial and posterior malleolus was found 37.17 ± 3.53 mm. Mean width and depth of malleolar groove were 10.26 ± 1.84 mm and 1.73 ± 0.75 mm, respectively. The mean intra-class correlation values were found between the 0.959 and 0.999.
conclusionsKnowing the distal tibial morphometry is crucial for designing convenient ankle replacement implants for Turkish population. To our knowledge, this study is the first in the literature that identifies posterior malleolar morphometry on dry tibiae. We believe that this study will make a significant contribution to the literature about distal tibial morphometry and especially the posterior malleolus and the data of our study can be used for designing total ankle prosthesis in Turkish population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39043950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.