ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Functional characterization and structural prediction of hypothetical proteins in monkeypox virus and identification of potential inhibitors.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrative bioinformatics framework for functional annotation and prioritization of hypothetical proteins in Bacillus thuringiensis relevant to biological pest control.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Severe viral rash progression prediction and surveillance early warning based on local-global attention and temporal convolutional network.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Current status of next-generation vaccines against mpox virus: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The excessive activation of the monkeypox virus (MPXV-Congo_8-156) is linked to various skin and respiratory disorders such as rashes, fluid-filled blisters, swollen lymph nodes and encephalitis (inflammation of the brain), highlighting MPXV-Congo_8-156 as a promising target for drug intervention. Despite the effectiveness of Cidofovir, in inhibiting MPXV activity, its limited ability to penetrate the skin and its strong side effects restrict its application. To address this challenge, we screened 500 compounds capable of penetrating the skin and gastrointestinal tract to identify potent MPXV inhibitors. Various characterization schemes and structural models of MPXV-Congo_8-156 were explored with bioinformatics tools like PROTPARAM, SOPMA, SWISS-MODEL and PROCHECK. Using molecular docking in PyRx, we evaluated the binding affinities of these compounds with MPXV-Congo_8-156 and identified the top five candidates ranging from - 9.2 to - 8.8 kcal/mol. ADMET analysis indicated that all five compounds were safer alternatives, showing no AMES toxicity or carcinogenicity in toxicological assessments. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, conducted for 100 ns each, confirmed the docking interactions of the top five compounds alongside the control (Cidofovir), validating their potential as MPXV inhibitors. The compounds with PubChem CID numbers 4061636, 4422538, 3583576, 4856107 and 4800629 demonstrated strong support in terms of root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) value, hydrogen bond analysis, and Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) analysis. Thus, our investigation identified these five compounds as promising inhibitors of MPXV, offering potential therapeutic avenues. However, further in vivo studies are necessary to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39043911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.