ArticleSurgery today2025
Effectiveness of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction in open abdomen management.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serial Bogota bag tightening: A pragmatic advance in open abdomen management for resource-limited settings.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Response to "comment on effectiveness of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction in open abdomen management".Surgery today · 2026Article
- Low-cost dynamic fascial traction using serial Bogota bag tightening in open abdomen management: A prospective randomized study.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Comment on "Effectiveness of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction in open abdomen management".Surgery today · 2026Article
- Mesh-mediated fascial traction for open abdomen management to prevent planned ventral hernias: a retrospective cohort.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) in patients undergoing open abdomen management (OAM).
methodsData from cases with OAM for at least five days who were admitted to our institution between January 2011 and December 2020 were included. We compared the patient's age, sex, medical history, indication for initial surgery, APACHE II scores, indication for OAM, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion, success of primary fascial closure (rectus fascial closure and bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method), success of planned ventral hernia, duration of OAM, and in-hospital mortality between patients undergoing VAWCM (VAWCM cases, n = 27) and vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAWC) alone (VAWC cases, n = 25).
resultsVAWCM cases had a significantly higher success rate of primary fascial closure (70% vs. 36%, p = 0.030) and lower in-hospital mortality (26% vs. 72%, p = 0.002) than VAWC cases. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that VAWCM was an independent factor influencing in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.53; p = 0.004).
conclusionVAWCM is associated with an increased rate of successful primary fascial closure and may reduce in-hospital mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39043902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.