Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39043898›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults.

Kate Bakken, Chris Horton, Mitchell Fisher, Corey G Wadsley, Ian Greenhouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kate BakkenAction Control Lab, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Chris HortonAction Control Lab, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Mitchell FisherAction Control Lab, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Corey G WadsleyAction Control Lab, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Ian GreenhouseAction Control Lab, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. img@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1467-739X

Funding

Computational roles of inhibition in human action controlR01NS123115 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Ian Greenhouse · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01NS123115NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human corticospinal excitability (CSE) modulates during movement, when muscles are active, but also at rest, when muscles are not active. These changes in resting motor system excitability can be transient or longer lasting. Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggests even relatively short periods of motor learning on the order of minutes can have lasting effects on resting CSE. Whether individuals are able to return CSE to out-of-task resting levels during the intertrial intervals (ITI) of behavioral tasks that do not include an intended motor learning component is an important question. Here, in twenty-five healthy young adults, we used single-pulse TMS and electromyography (EMG) to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during two different resting contexts: (1) prior to engaging in the response task during which participants were instructed only to rest (out-of-task), and (2) ITI of a choice-reaction time task (in-task). In both contexts, five TMS intensities were used to evaluate possible differences in recruitment of corticospinal (CS) output across a range of inputs. We hypothesized resting state CSE would be greater during ITI than out-of-task rest, reflected in larger MEP amplitudes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no significant difference in MEP amplitudes between out-of-task rest and in-task ITI, and instead found evidence of equivalence, indicating that humans are able to return to a stable motor resting state within seconds after a response. These data support the interpretation that rest is a uniform motor state in the healthy nervous system. In the future, our data may be a useful reference for motor disorder populations with an impaired ability to return to rest.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorPyramidal TractsRestTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTime FactorsYoung AdultCorticospinal excitabilityMotor controlMotor evoked potentialResting stateTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39043898
PMCPMC11759664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.