Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39043878›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Reintroduction of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia, Unionida) directly after channel dredging can serve as an effective measure in mitigation conservation.

Małgorzata Ożgo, Maria Urbańska, Urszula Biereżnoj-Bazille, Piotr Marczakiewicz, Karolina Tarka, Andrzej Kamocki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Małgorzata OżgoDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland. mozgo.biol@interia.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-8450
Maria UrbańskaInstitute of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1239-8231
Urszula Biereżnoj-BazilleBiebrza National Park, Osowiec-Twierdza, Poland.
Piotr MarczakiewiczBiebrza National Park, Osowiec-Twierdza, Poland.
Karolina TarkaBiebrza National Park, Osowiec-Twierdza, Poland.
Andrzej KamockiFaculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Białystok University of Technology, Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1375-8198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is based on a natural experiment carried out in the Biebrza National Park, Poland. The study site was a channel inhabited by Anodonta anatina, A. cygnea, Unio pictorum and U. tumidus. The deepening of the channel to restore ecosystem connectivity provided an opportunity to conduct this study. Mussels were collected before dredging, held in captivity for 48 h, measured, individually tagged and released post-dredging to the same 5-m channel sections they originated from. They were subsequently monitored for three consecutive years. Mussel survival remained high throughout the study, and no increased mortality in the year following reintroduction was observed. There was no growth retardation. Mussel mobility was low, with most individuals remaining in the same channel section in which they were released. Recolonisation patterns were consistent with the composition of mussel communities in adjacent unaffected habitats. Although dredging drastically changes mussel habitat, some characteristics: microclimate, water chemistry, nutrient availability and host fish can remain adequate. Our study shows that reintroducing mussels to the same site can serve as an effective mitigation conservation measure and can be preferable to translocation, particularly when carried out under time pressure with limited possibilities of assigning appropriate destination sites.

Indexed as

BivalviaConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFresh WaterAnimalsAnodontaPoland

Identifiers

PMID39043878
PMCPMC11266403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.