ArticleScientific reports2024
Reconstruction of excitation waves from mechanical deformation using physics-informed neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the accuracy of implicit neural representations for cardiovascular anatomies and hemodynamic fields.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Clinically Oriented Review with Engineering Primers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive assessment of the electrical activation pattern can significantly contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, due to faster and safer diagnosis, improved surgical planning and easier follow-up. One promising path is to measure the mechanical contraction via echocardiography and utilize this as an indirect way of measuring the original activation pattern. To solve this demanding inversion task, we make use of physics-informed neural networks, an upcoming methodology to solve forward and inverse physical problems governed by partial differential equations. In this study, synthetic data sets were created, consisting of 2D excitation waves coupled to an isotropic and linearly deforming elastic medium. We show that for both focal and spiral patterns, the underlying excitation waves can be reconstructed accurately. We test the robustness of the method against Gaussian noise, reduced spatial resolution and projected tri-planar data. In situations where the data quality is heavily reduced, we show how to improve the reconstruction by additional regularization on the wave speed. Our findings suggest that physics-informed neural networks hold the potential to solve sparse and noisy bio-mechanical inversion problems and may offer a pathway to non-invasive assessment of certain cardiac arrhythmias.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.